How journalism works: First, see this (ignoring the bit on the right about it being a parody):
Next, write this (ignoring the bit about it not being true):
Then, explain to your editor that you didn't need a second source because you heard it straight from the CEO himself... sort of, before hearing the dim and distant sound of a penny dropping.
Thanks to everybody who has flagged this today.

It's still the top Google News hit for the iPhone story, but the link now goes to 'this page doesn't exist'. (Neither did the story.)
Posted by: Jon Silk | Jun 27, 2010 at 13:51
Daily Mail now outsourcing "just making stuff up" duties.
Posted by: Anthony Zacharzewski | Jun 27, 2010 at 21:12
I love more the fact that they didnt read the Bio on the twitter Prof.
Proper Journalism.
Posted by: KevinH | Jun 27, 2010 at 21:53
They didn't even get the price right.
Posted by: Leo Davidson | Jun 27, 2010 at 22:29
What's more interesting than this shocking lack of any journalism is the tendency of online media to just delete any problem articles. The retraction/correction/apology seems to be dying in the online world. Not that it's much cop in the printed world these days.
Posted by: Antonio Lorusso | Jun 28, 2010 at 02:32
So this is why they hate the internet!
Posted by: Mike | Jun 28, 2010 at 03:09
Great spot. Now pulled from the Mail site.
Surely the bio gave the game away.
Posted by: Stephen Waddington | Jun 28, 2010 at 11:07
This is the kind of "journalism" that they want you to now PAY FOR folks... yeah right.
If we pay the DM what they are worth, then they owe us all money.
Posted by: Ian | Jul 01, 2010 at 10:45