This astrologer lead mumbo-jumbo, below, is what passes for "science" in the Daily Mail where the awkward spectre of good taste would never dissuade them from writing a story that reads as though random words have simply been passed from the backside of some dictionary-eating simpleton straight onto the page. Today, meet the 'supermoon':
Putting aside the dubious qualification of crackpot astrologers to comment on the causes of a natural disaster, the Mail's use of the word "latest" in the headline suggests there is already some undeniable evidence on record that the 'supermoon' has previously caused untold disasters. There isn't.
The worst thing is almost that this theory was refuted 2 days ago, in an article on the Telegraph's website - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/nightsky/8369718/Moon-to-look-bigger-next-weekend-during-lunar-perigee.html
Posted by: Rasmus Jensen | Mar 11, 2011 at 19:04