« He's no Malcolm Tucker... | Main | The most offensive advert ever...? »

May 28, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What's best is that it took them four bullet points under the headline to explain it.

So basically 'Barrister fined for having cocaine & ecstasy' as the rest of it would seem to have no relevance to the story...


Try this on for size in The Times today! Took me three reads to work out what it meant and even then I wasn't sure till I read the article! 'Race-taunt police officer punched father of teenage girl groomed for sex'. The sub even put it in quotation marks despite it having no reference to dialogue at all!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts