« He's no Malcolm Tucker... | Main | The most offensive advert ever...? »
The beauty of a great headline is that it needs no explanation, it leaps out at you and grabs your attention. But Daily Mail readers could be forgiven for needing a pencil and paper and a copy of Who's Who to fathom this triple decker effort:
(Hat tip David Walsh)
| |
|
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a011570c131b2970c016766e1b0cf970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Confused yet...?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
What's best is that it took them four bullet points under the headline to explain it.
Posted by: John Self | May 28, 2012 at 22:43
So basically 'Barrister fined for having cocaine & ecstasy' as the rest of it would seem to have no relevance to the story...
Posted by: Jason Smith | May 28, 2012 at 23:02
Pardon?
Posted by: Emily (@amummytoo) | May 29, 2012 at 08:24
Try this on for size in The Times today! Took me three reads to work out what it meant and even then I wasn't sure till I read the article! 'Race-taunt police officer punched father of teenage girl groomed for sex'. The sub even put it in quotation marks despite it having no reference to dialogue at all!
Posted by: Holly Sutton | May 29, 2012 at 10:51