« He's no Malcolm Tucker... | Main | The most offensive advert ever...? »

May 28, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a011570c131b2970c016766e1b0cf970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Confused yet...?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

What's best is that it took them four bullet points under the headline to explain it.

So basically 'Barrister fined for having cocaine & ecstasy' as the rest of it would seem to have no relevance to the story...

Try this on for size in The Times today! Took me three reads to work out what it meant and even then I wasn't sure till I read the article! 'Race-taunt police officer punched father of teenage girl groomed for sex'. The sub even put it in quotation marks despite it having no reference to dialogue at all!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter   Facebook   RSS

Recent Posts

Advertising
Blogs
Broadcasting
Broadsheets
Future
Journalism
Magazines
Online
Pr
Sillyseason
Tabloids
Television

Media News: Guardian

News: Journalism

Become a Fan